SHOUT FOR JOY
  • Paul
  • David
  • Peter
  • John
  • INDICES
  • Psalm 118

                Shout for Joy              

Freedom and morality

3/12/2018

0 Comments

 
We need to reflect once again on John Adams’ observation that "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." Why is that true? It's true because apart from a standard for what is right and wrong, the resulting "freedom" allows rebellious human nature to take control and chaos is the predictable result. Religion provides people with a set of rights and wrongs and if this moral code is removed there remains no particular reason for the individual to live in harmony with others.
       In a morality free world nothing can be wrong – it's in the definition! If your neighbor decides to move his fence onto your property, there's no reason why he shouldn't. The fence has been moved, you've lost land, but, since nothing is wrong, how could you argue that this was? I'm reminded of the story of an old VW van covered with stickers; one on the rear said, "If it feels good, do it." As it cruised along, a shiny new BMW pulled up behind wanting to pass. Reading the sign, the driver of the “Bimmer” pushed the van off the road. The irate occupant of the  van got out to protest, but found it difficult to deny that the other had the right to do whatever felt good to him. Gotta stick by your slogans!
       At this point I'm not claiming that one set of responsibilities is necessarily better than another. All I'm saying is that apart from some standard, society cannot exist as such. What normally happens when a group of people moves away from regulation is that whoever has the power takes control. Now a standard does exist – the will of the most powerful. So, in fact, some sort of "morality" does exists. The crucial question is what sort of control is best? Which method of assuring the best for everyone has proven itself in history? The two extremes are absolute dictatorship at one extremity and the genuine freedom of social-concern at the other.
       What Adams is saying is that apart from the control provided by an inner morality there is no way for freedom to flourish in a social setting. Our laws are simply secular expressions of our morality. We observe the speed limit because we don't want to endanger either ourselves or someone else. That people ought not drive faster than such and such a speed isn't an arbitrary decision. It's the result of a moral sense that driving too fast is wrong. Remove the moral element and freedom evaporates. True freedom is the opportunity to do what is right.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Robert H Mounce
    President Emeritus
    Whitworth University
    .

    Friends Sites
    Biblical Training_
    Sceadu Design
    Creative Savv
    Frugal Retirement
    _

    Archives

    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    August 2016

    Archives
    January 2016 
    December 2015 
    November 2015 

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
Trial balloon
  • Paul
  • David
  • Peter
  • John
  • INDICES
  • Psalm 118